On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 12:03 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:49:46 +0200 (CEST) > Adam Pribyl wrote: > > > The only reason I know is, that "people tend to modify grub.cfg manually", > > but with grub2 this is plain wrong anyway. Why do we support this messy > > setup then? > > Because the reverse is true - requiring a tool to modify grub.cfg > is plain wrong, modifying it manually is the only way to go. What > we should do is get rid of all the template files and grub2-mkconfig > and just ship grubby. (One of the prime reasons grub replaced lilo > was that you didn't have to remember to run some stupid tool after > editing your grub config, yet here is grub2 with a stupid tool > again - even stupider because it isn't actually necessary). grubby isn't capable of generating a config file from scratch. We still need grub2-mkconfig for anaconda. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
