On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 08:42 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:08:04PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 10:11 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > > > [1] "The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary > > > > architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on > > > > those architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso > > > > install media" > > > > > > If there are no further objections I'll put it into Alpha criteria tomorrow. > > > > I'm okay with it, but I'm CCing bcl to give him a chance to object if > > anaconda team feels that supporting PXE in Alpha is unnecessarily > > ambitious... > > Yes, I think Alpha is too early to require PXE to work. I'm fine with > Beta. In general I think we need to be fairly loose with Anaconda and > Alpha -- as long as there is some way to boot the installer I'm happy. > We currently don't see alot of installer testing in rawhide so the > period before Alpha is too short to expect everything to be working. That sounds reasonable to me. Kamil, do you hate making it Beta? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
