On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 12:26 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 18:40:46 +0200, >> Joachim Backes <joachim.backes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >On 03/31/2012 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> >> I found the code used. It is in the accountsservices package, not gdm as >> >> expected. >> >> >> >> There is a list of excluded users and any users with a shell that has >> >> a basename of false or "nologin" are also excepted. >> >> >> >> The list of excluded users is currently: >> >> bin, root, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, >> >> nobody, nobody4, noaccess, postgres, pvm, rpm, nfsnobody, pcap >> > >> >Hi Bruno, >> > >> >thanks for your clarification. So my proposal: why not extend this hard >> >coded list by a second (dynamic) one administratable by the fedora admin? >> >> I think you can as there was code to add more logins to the list. I think >> it uses dconf keys to do it, which are a bit of a pain to set, especially >> for gdm instead of the current user. > > No, gdm doesn't currently do its own filtering on top, except for > excluding 'gdm' and uid 0. Discussion seem to have stalled ... what are we going to do about this? -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
