On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 12:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> I pretty much agree, every time we've talked about it we've figured >> there's not actually a whole lot that needs to be done. The biggest >> thing really is to make sure there are people with every supported ARM >> target device who are willing to file a 'does it work' report (and, >> obviously, bugs where it doesn't) for each compose, I can't see a lot >> beyond that at present. Peter, can you? Are there any big problems with >> actually running ARM at the moment of the kind that would be appropriate >> to turn into test cases for the future, or is it really just a case >> right now of development grind in getting things to build? > > Oh - and the other obvious thing to hit that _could_ in theory differ > from the other arches is the 'are there any conflicts in the packages on > the media' test (the packages could be different) and the 'can you > install updates' test (could be yum config or repo issues). When it goes to primary arch this is unlikely to be an issue, there's even now currently not that many packages that don't build, certainly none in the usual desktop spins. In Secondary as we're trailing this is always a possibility, we'll be chasing it as closely as possible and will follow up a quickly as possible. ARM has a lot of attention upstream as well, I think possibly more than PPC had, and it's quite amazing how interested and willing most upstreams are to fix issues. Peter -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
