Re: Fedora ARM QA testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 12:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:

> I pretty much agree, every time we've talked about it we've figured
> there's not actually a whole lot that needs to be done. The biggest
> thing really is to make sure there are people with every supported ARM
> target device who are willing to file a 'does it work' report (and,
> obviously, bugs where it doesn't) for each compose, I can't see a lot
> beyond that at present. Peter, can you? Are there any big problems with
> actually running ARM at the moment of the kind that would be appropriate
> to turn into test cases for the future, or is it really just a case
> right now of development grind in getting things to build?

Oh - and the other obvious thing to hit that _could_ in theory differ
from the other arches is the 'are there any conflicts in the packages on
the media' test (the packages could be different) and the 'can you
install updates' test (could be yum config or repo issues).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux