On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 16:22 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 03/24/2012 03:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The big difference is that ARM doesn't currently use, or plan to use, > > anaconda for deployment. They work by building images specific to > > particular target devices, which you just dump onto the device and then > > boot. > > Which only means that the relevant reporters do not have to perform the > install test matrix. > Either the image works for them or it doesn't > ( it kinda goes without saying that if it doesn't they should file a > report )... I was thinking in terms of just having a mini-matrix for ARM, pretty much as you describe: it'd just have a column for every supported box and have a 'Does it boot?' result row, pretty much. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
