On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 08:55 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > I installed a system fresh with Fedora 15 when it was released. I > configured the file system to have root on a software RAID 1 and then > encrypted the ext4 file system inside of the raid. > > I tried to upgrade to F16 a few days ago and ran into an Anaconda > bug[1]. Is my particular use-case supported and then does it need a QA > test case? I see a test case for encrypted root but not for > RAID+encrypted root. In regards to the bug, am I stuck doing a yum > upgrade or is there a possible workaround to use preupgrade? I'd suggest that this is 'supported' in terms of the release criteria, under the Final criterion "The installer must be able to create and install to any workable partition layout using any file system offered in a default installer configuration, LVM, software, hardware or BIOS RAID, or combination of the above": we don't explicitly list encryption there, but we probably should, and I'd read the intent of the criterion as being that encryption should be covered. So, I'd say you could propose your bug as a Final blocker. As far as 'should there be a test case' - well, it's kind of a tricky question: there are essentially unlimited permutations when it comes to filesystem layout, and we can't have a test case for *every single one*, especially not a test case that must be done for the release to proceed. There'd be no harm at all in you drawing up a test case for this scenario, but whether we should add it to the matrices and especially whether we should mark it as Final (indicating it has to be completed for the release to ship) is a more difficult question. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
