On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 18:31 +0000, Andre Robatino wrote: > Petr Schindler <pschindl <at> redhat.com> writes: > > > 'A "fedora-release" package containing the correct names, information > > and repository configuration for a final Fedora release (as opposed to a > > pre-release) must be present on ISO media while the appropriately > > versioned "generic-release" package must be available in the online > > release repository' > > It might be good to check also that fedora-release-rawhide is NOT on the media. > There was a mixup with F15 where the original fedora-release depended on > fedora-release-rawhide, causing it to be on the media. A fixed version of > fedora-release which obsoleted it was pushed, which updated properly when using > yum (which is what the testers including me were using), but not when using > PackageKit ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716752 ) and this bug > is still not fixed. The 'correct repos' script should check for this by implication, because if fedora-release-rawhide is installed, then the rawhide repository will be present. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
