On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 14:23 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:10 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote: > > Hello Testers and rawhide Users, > > > > Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The directories > > /bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks: > > /bin → /usr/bin > > /sbin → /usr/sbin > > /lib → /usr/lib > > /lib64 → /usr/lib64 > > I've just tested building a live image from the /usr move repository. It > boots, and the /usr move changes appear to be implemented. I'm currently > testing if it can be installed successfully. > > One thing I already noticed is that there seems to be a problem with the > ntfs-3g executables. /bin/ntfs-3g seems to be a symlink to itself - it > shows as "/bin/ntfs-3g -> /bin/ntfs-3g" in ls output. Trying to do 'ls > -l /usr/bin/ntfs-3g' results in 'cannot access /usr/bin/ntfs-3g: Too > many levels of symbolic links'. /bin/ntfsmount is similarly affected. > > On a pre-/usr move system it seems that these executables are actually > located in /bin but have symlinks in /usr/bin - /usr/bin/ntfs-3g is a > symlink to /bin/ntfs-3g . Perhaps the existence of these symlinks > in /usr/bin confused things? Installation fails at partitioning stage, with udisksd hitting "Error opening /etc/crypttab file: Failed to open file '/etc/crypttab': No such file or directory (g-file-error-quark, 4)" The file /etc/crypttab indeed doesn't exist. I'm not sure if this is actually specific to the /usr move stuff, but it does prevent me being able to ensure that installation works from a /usr-moved live image. I have a non-usr-move image also, I'll test install with that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
