Re: New criterion for Checksum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:02 +0000, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Petr Schindler <pschindl <at> redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > I propose new final criterion: 
> > 
> > "There must be published correct checksum for each ISO media. Also if there is
> embedded checksum on ISO
> > media, it must be correct."  
> > 
> > I think we should check this. We have already test case [1]. I propose to
> change release level for this test
> > case to final.
> > 
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_ISO_Checksums
> 
> I think that having a published correct checksum for each ISO should be Alpha
> level. If the ISO can't be verified, then the results of any other testing on it
> are suspect. Also, publishing the correct checksums can be done without altering
> the ISOs themselves, so it's easy to ensure that this test passes. Getting the
> embedded checksum correct is less important since an independent check is
> possible.

Yeah, I did think that too. It seems like the kind of thing that should
always be correct.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux