On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Josh Boyer (jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Rob Healey (robhealey1@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> >> Can anyone tell me if rpmfusion's rawhide packages have been updated yet >> >> for rpm guard? >> > >> > Given that, at best, rpmfusion builds against rawhide/branched Fedora, >> > and that the converted packages only live in the side repository at the >> > moment... no. >> > >> > It's not even clear that any rpmfusion packages would need modified. >> >> Harald has a patch to kernel.spec to install modules in /usr/lib/modules/ >> instead of /lib/. When that goes in, I would think the rpmfusion kmods would >> need a similar adjustment. > > As long as /lib redirects to /usr/lib... it shouldn't be *required*. Then the patch to kernel.spec shouldn't be either. My tiny brain says that if one switches, the rest should too. josh -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
