|
> To: test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: robatino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: test signed checksum files and torrents the same way ISOs are tested now? > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:46:14 +0000 > > Currently, ISOs are posted in a temporary location, go through a > test-fix-test-fix... cycle, then when ready (as decided at the Go/No-Go meeting) > are posted in permanent locations. This does not happen with signed checksum > files and .torrent files, even though they are part of the published content. I > propose that > > 1) ASAP after ISOs are Gold (but never before), the checksum files should be > signed and be placed in the stage/ directory replacing the unsigned checksum > files. > > 2) The .torrent files should then be created, using the ISOs and signed checksum > files in stage/, and placed in some temporary location (NOT where they currently > go). > > 3) QA tests should be done to verify that the checksum files in stage/ are > properly signed and have checksums matching those for the previous unsigned > files, and that the .torrent files match the content in stage/ (both ISOs and > signed checksum files). These tests are objective and trivial, so obviously > don't need another Go/No-Go meeting. > > 4) When the signed checksum tests pass, the ISOs and signed checksum files get > sent to the mirrors. > > 5) When the .torrent tests pass, the .torrent files go to their permanent > locations. (Of course this doesn't have to be done immediately, the important > thing is that it doesn't happen until the tests pass.) > > 6) When all tests pass, the corresponding files in stage/ can optionally be > deleted. If any tests fail, fix and test again. > > Does this sound reasonable? > It sounds sane to me. The only question is, can we do a test download of the .torrent somehow. John. |
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
