On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:54:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 17:47 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On 29 November 2011 17:40, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hey, folks. I'm working through the f16 QA retrospective, and one of the > > > suggestions is: > > > > > > "might need improved / more Xen test cases" > > > > > > > Does this mean various DomU tests or Dom0 tests? > > That's sort of the question, I'm asking, really! It would be nice to expand the tests, and it kind of boils down to: 1) Does it boot 2) Does it work The complexity is that there are three modes of this: HVM (so similar to the KVM test-case), PV (we got that covered now), and the Dom0 (which is mostly - does it boot and you kind of implicitly need to do this before you can do the other two). So I think it makes sense to add the HVM case in the test-matrix - it is pretty simple and similar to the KVM one. The dom0 is a bit more complex, but we already have it outlined in the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0 in the Documentation part - so it should be fairly easy to lift it out of there. (adn the stuff about the bridge is not needed anymore). > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
