> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:51, Andre Robatino > <robatino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 17Alpha > > 17AlphaNTH > > 17Beta > > 17BetaNTH > > 17Final (or alternatively 17) > > 17FinalNTH (or alternatively 17NTH) > > Why not: > 17AlphaBlocker > 17AlphaNTH > 17BetaBlocker > 17BetaNTH > 17FinalBlocker > 17FinalNTH > ... verbosity can be such a great thing! ;) Maybe even consider > expanding NTH, i.e. 17FinalNiceToHave. The more people understand > without looking things up, the better. > > Personally, I'd stick with F17 instead of 17, but can't find any very > good reason (either way) :) They field is called "Blocks:", so there doesn't need to be "Blocker" suffix. I think this is pretty self-explanatory: Blocks: F17Beta I would also add F-prefix, it just looks better. Whether to use Andre's or Sandro's proposal, I don't care. But I agree they are more obvious than current naming scheme. The "-accepted" word makes you think those blockers were accepted, and it's not the case. They are just NTH. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
