On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 18:57 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 29 November 2011 18:51, Andre Robatino <robatino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The current naming scheme for naming blocker and NTH bugs is irregular - for > > example, > > > > F17Alpha > > F17Alpha-accepted > > F17Beta > > F17Beta-accepted > > F17Blocker > > F17-accepted > > > > The word "Blocker" is in only one of the three blocker bugs. I also personally > > find "accepted" more confusing than "NTH" (assuming one already knows what "NTH" > > stands for). Since Bugzilla uses simple numbers like 17 (not F17) for the > > What does NTH stand for? Nice To Have. The process here is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process . It's the process we use to assess and track issues which don't block releases, but are significant enough that we'd take fixes for them through the Alpha, Beta and Final freezes. It replaced the old 'tag request' process by which you just requested a freeze exception ad-hoc and it was evaluated by releng on a case-by-case basis. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
