On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 10:53 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 10:29 -0600, David Lehman wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 09:42 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 21:42:40 -0600, > > > Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Old-grub also didn't support newer Linux-md metadata formats, so that > > > > should be explicitly mentioned (I don't know about grub2). > > > > > > grub1 supports md raid version 1.0 metadata. (That's the new one with the > > > meta data at the end of the partition.) > > > > Right. grub1 supports 0.90 and 1.0. grub2 supports 0.90, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 > > AFAIK. > > So, summary: with grub2 we should actually be able to support /boot on > RAID-0, RAID-1 or RAID-5, metadata 0.90, 1.0, 1.1 or 1.2? Is that > accurate? Yes. Theoretically, at least. Also, as mentioned by Rudolf, grub2 should support /boot on lvm. The stacking of lvm-on-md for /boot, while possibly excessive, should also work. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
