On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 02:16 -0400, Akira TAGOH wrote: > Thanks for considering to add a criterion for translations. I'm > excited to see that. > Since I missed this post, sorry for not bringing this up earlier. > > So I'd clarify this, what exactly "popular languages" is. that sounds > like a quite vague and might make a flamewar when any case is raising. > So that would be nice if it explicitly has the measurable way what we > are fully going to support on the release, such as languages meets > over 90% of translations complete at the translation deadline or stats > on smolt etc. I think we'd mostly wind up going with 'number of people who speak the language', which should be reasonably clear-cut. The idea is just to give us a get-out clause for a bug which only affects a very little-used language. I'm not sure if it's a great idea to tie ourselves to an inflexible number-based definition, as that could lead to problems down the road when some language that just doesn't quite make the number but is really still pretty important gets broken... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
