On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:46:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 15:35 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:18:39 -0600 > > > Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >> My intention was to include issues with DomU running locally (with an > > >> already functional Fedora Dom0) or on a Xen based cloud provider. My > > >> implicit assumption was that Dom0 would already be working but since > > >> F16 is the first supported Dom0 since F8, that could be problematic. > > >> For F17 and later, I imagine that we could just say that it needs to > > >> run with a previous release as Dom0. > > > > > > How about: > > > - The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases > > > providing a functional, supported Xen Dom0 and cloud providers > > > utilizing Xen. This does not include any issues limited to the > > > release functioning as Xen Dom0. > > > > Do you have a test plan to go along with this criteria? > > Well, er: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt > > it could use some, let's say, expansion. =) Is there a good template for these QA test-cases? I can flesh it a bit and provide local-type QA, which is: 1). Install Dom0 2). Install DomU 3). Do stuff. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test