On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 12:54 -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > After discussions both here and on devel@, there have been no > objections to adding Xen DomU (guest) support as a release criterion for > Fedora 16. > > So, I am proposing that we add the following as a release criterion for > Fedora 16 final: > > - The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases > supporting Xen Dom0 and cloud providers utilizing Xen. > > If accepted as a release criterion, Xen DomU (not Dom0) issues will > block the release of Fedora. > > Thoughts on blocker/NTH? Changes to wording? I'd like to get this > resolved this week since we're already cutting things a bit close here > if it is accepted as a release criteria. 'With releases supporting Xen Dom0' is slightly vague but probably good enough for now. I'm not exactly sure what we want to say about the Dom0; I think the concept is that DomU functionality shouldn't be broken, anything that's a bug on the Dom0 level isn't a blocker issue, right? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
