On 10/13/2011 10:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 12:04 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 15:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:20 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote: >>> >>>> Cool, well glad to see that is being dealt with. No takers for the GDM >>>> problem? >>> Not sure about that one, haven't seen it on either of my systems. They >>> both log me in successfully every time. >> The one thing that I ran into yesterday when doing some test builds, was >> when creating a user I tried to use a specific UID in 500 (due to things >> on my server side) and it caused problems in kdm or gdm. Once I did an >> install and used the default of 1000 (changed things on my server side >> to match and for future upgrade) then things seemed to work as should. >> Although the only thing I didn't test was gdm, as I am using KDE and >> didn't do another install to see what would happen on the gdm/gnome side >> with default user. >> >> If your upgrading then maybe there is a problem since using older #'s, >> then again might be something else totally different. > What I found happened if you used a uid under 1000 was the user simply > didn't show up in gdm at all, as it's considered a 'system user'. In my case at least this isn't the problem. It would have been had the alpha install gone correctly, but it managed to corrupt my partitions so a clean install it was. Thus I stare out from the lofty heights of UID 1000 :). No this may be related to the fingerprint reader, or at least after activating the fingerprint bit the whole system went a little more sideways than usual. -Erinn -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
