On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 14:38:02 -0700 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 16:02 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > It's not so much a question of 'do we have the resources in place to > probably make sure it works at release time' but 'is it a terrible > disaster if we make a release in which it's broken'. That's what the > release validation process is meant to ensure, and _only_ that. It's > not like, if we don't make it a release blocker, it means no-one will > care about Xen and it will always be broken. I think that another consideration would be that if Fedora doesn't work as Xen DomU at release time, using the final media (DVD, netinstall ISO etc.) to create DomUs will never work. I'm not as worried about Dom0 at release time because unless I'm missing something, that could likely be fixed with updates post-release. Granted, using the DVDs isn't the only way to make a DomU but it's certainly more difficult to create DomUs without them, especially if the issue is with something that is not likely to get updated post-release (anaconda, lorax et. al.). I'm not sure that I'd vote for a release criteria to make DomU or Dom0 issues release blocking but unless there are objections, I think that making Xen issues NTH for Final (and maybe Beta) would be a good idea. Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
