On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 03:00 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: > On 30 September 2011 20:23, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So this discussion seems to have stalled. Tim and I are both ambivalent, > > and we got three responses that were positive but tentative or from > > 'interested parties' (no offence :>). Does anyone who doesn't have skin > > in the game have an opinion either way? > > I'll just mention that as far as I'm concernd Fedora 16 boots and runs > *VERY* well as a dom0 and a domU, the sticking point is the actual > installation as a domU (the paravirtual device driver issue, probably > grub2 issues) I can get around this for my own purposes by "knife and > forking" together a system image copied from a non-xen installation, > it would be a shame to not have this feature mor easily available ... What's necessary to make it a release blocker is not so much 'it'd be nice if it worked' arguments - I think in general everyone agrees it'd be nice if it worked :) - but more 'it would be terrible to release without it working, because' arguments. That's the level of impact we need for release criteria, because something being in the release criteria means that if it's not working, we don't ship. Which is a pretty high bar to get over. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
