On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 15:29 -0400, Bob Lightfoot wrote: > The > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_Upgrade_Skip_Bootloader says the expected results are as follows: > > > Expected Results > 1. The system should be upgraded to Fedora 16 version without > error > 2. The system can boot into new version fedora without error > 3. The opened terminal, file browser, or other system > applications should display and work correctly > > How does the newly installed system boot into new version fedora when > there is no entry in the bootloader for it. It seems to me that the > present way it is written this testcase will always fail. > > A more realistic set of results would be that any non fedora > bootloader entries still work and that the new fedora can be booted if > manually grub bootstrapped. > > Unless I am misunderstanding this testcase? As I wrote in the bug I believe you're correct here, the test case is not correct as written: this option is supposed to not touch the bootloader configuration, and hence there is a chance it will result in an unbootable system (if the kernel from the previous release is still available I think the configuration will be bootable, but we can't rely on that). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
