On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:54 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > I'm still on the opinion that we should not be adding an ks testing to > the alpha criteria. > > Cant we just create a set of most commonly ks use cases in ks files for > releng and they can use pungi to test it with and post the result > somewhere online with pass/fail more of an autoqa task and say all those > must pass before beta? > > Where does the need for those ks testing suddenly come from and why do > we need to have those ks test involved in alpha? sorry, I skipped over Smooge's mention of Alpha. I was aiming for Beta, not Alpha. I think Smooge's minimal 'does a stock install ks file work' would be fine as a Beta test. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
