On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:26:44 +0100 Richard Hughes wrote: > I'm seriously wondering if multilib is worth all this hassle... Oh I've never wondered that: It has clearly never been a good idea. Starting with the total lack of documentation about how the heck it actually works when (for instance) multilib rpms both contain /usr/bin binaries of the same name and going through all the problems it causes with updates (like these). Seems to me the "problem" should always have been fixed by simply packaging the rpms correctly with shared noarch bits in one rpm, /lib bits in another, /lib64 bits in another, and /bin bits in yet another. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
