On 17 aug. 2011, at 21:52, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 12:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Now I think about it, here's an alternative: let's just dump the >> EFI-specific criterion and take EFI bugs under the generic criteria. I >> don't see why we can't just say that the installer failing to boot on an >> EFI system is a violation of "The installer must boot (if appropriate) >> and run on all primary architectures from default live image, DVD, and >> boot.iso install media", for instance. It *is*, after all. Ditto for "In >> most cases (see Blocker_Bug_FAQ), a system installed according to any of >> the above criteria (or the appropriate Beta or Final criteria, when >> applying this criterion to those releases) must boot to the 'firstboot' >> utility on the first boot after installation", and any of the "The >> installer must be able to complete an installation" clauses... > > So, a way to clarify that would be to amend: > > "The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary > architectures from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install media" > > to read: > > "The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary > architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on those > architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install media" > This sounds good to me. The previous wording regarding to Mac systems made me wonder if they were included at all. > -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
