Hey, folks. So a few months back we discussed the issue of QA go/no-go votes, and agreed that we could simply prescribe a formula for the vote and remove any element of subjectiveness from it, which would mean it wouldn't really matter who cast QA's 'vote' at the meeting, and I edited https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting to reflect this. I've just realized that the definition was a bit incomplete, though: it considers whether or not there are accepted blockers, but doesn't consider whether or not validation testing is complete. Obviously, the appropriate set of validation tests has to be complete for us to vote 'yes'. So I've just amended the page to read: "QA approves the release if all validation tests appropriate to the release phase (Alpha, Beta or Final) have been performed and there are no accepted blocker bugs that are unaddressed in the candidate compose. QA does not approve the release if there are any accepted blocker bugs that are unaddressed in the candidate compose or if validation testing is incomplete." I think it's a pretty obvious change, but if anyone has worries about it, speak up! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
