Re: Post-TC1 strategizin'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 14:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 06:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
> > for post-Alpha TC1.
> >
> > We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
> > have a lot of blocker bugs remaining. TC1 is in pretty bad shape.
> 
> Why did this happen?  What went wrong?  The strategy should be based on
> that. 

Don't quite see what you mean. We're behind because the TC1 images were
delayed by a week, that's pretty much it. The shape they're in when they
arrive is a function of the developers, we don't have much control over
it =)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux