On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 23:10 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > > "Typically Fedora isn't used a server" > > > > Really? > > Well, it's working pretty well for me on my NAS and dhcp/tftp/nameserver/general > boxes at home. > > Ymmv but I've been using Fedora on servers since FC1 - I might chose another > distribution for things that I want to deploy long-term or for special cases > like my router but personally (and given the way I manage the boxes at home) I > don't have any major problems. > > Yes, there is change and yes, I will sometimes need to learn new things but in > general the skills I gain figuring out a change in Fedora soon become useful on > a much broader range of distros (that's something that's been true all the way > back to Red Hat Linux to be honest). On a 'theory of argument' note: "not typically used as a server" does not mean the same thing as "never used as a server" (and moreover, was clearly carefully worded that way). Given that, anecdotal instances of "but I use it as a server!" don't really serve to further the argument in a concrete way. I think we had some pretty useful responses noting alternative ways to manage systemd and plans to improve s-c-s which I think addressed the initial concerns pretty well, right? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
