On Friday, July 08, 2011 10:10:33 AM James Laska wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:15 +0000, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > 2. Highlight differences - Draft individual wiki pages for each > > > > > > arch for each milestone (Alpha, Beta, Final). However, instead > > > of duplicating all applicable primary arch content, only > > > highlight the differences between the primary and secondary > > > arch. > > > > > > * PROS - A little less work than the full-duplication > > > > > > approach > > > > > > * CONS - Still a lot of wiki maintenance. Not > > > necessarily > > > > > > in terms of wiki content, but definitely in terms of > > > wiki pages. Having plenty of experience trying to > > > figure out whether a but impacts criteria, I think this > > > creates additional hoops to jump through to figure out > > > if a bug impacts the criteria or not. > > > > I think that this is the way to do it. one page per secondary arch noting > > differences, for instance sparc is likely to be almost exactly the same, > > there is a desktop and server target. so differences really will be > > minimal. > > This will be my first fall-back scenario if I can't get something folks > like with the wiki templates. I'm not real keen on having to inspect > *multiple* pages to figure out whether a proposed bug is a blocker or > not. But this approach definitely would be simpler in terms of wiki > magic. Secondary blockers are primary NTH, but never primary blockers. a primary blocker i guess could be a secondary nth. but i highly doubt it. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
