Re: Developing secondary architecture release criteria

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 11:03 -0400, James Laska wrote:

> > If doable we should try to come up with a solution aimed at/fits 
> > multiple release cycles
> 
> How do you mean ... something that works for Fedora 13, 14, 15, 16
> etc... ?  We have that now, I just didn't include any details about how
> the pages are updated when a new release comes along.  Adam and I have
> talked about an SOP to cover this, but we don't have any thing final
> yet.  

I think by 'multiple release cycles' he meant the case where we release
the DVD and two live images in June, the other live images in July and
the PPC images in August, or whatever.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux