On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 14:14 -0400, James Laska wrote: > > > I dunno, that was just the wording I came up with at the time, I > > > think :) If we can clarify it, that's all to the good. > > > > Is it better/same/worse as follows ... > > > > * The final branded release notes from the Documentation team > must > > be present on ISO media and the appropriately versioned > generic > > release notes must be available in the online release > repository > > * A fedora-release package containing the correct names, > > information and repository configuration for a final Fedora > > release (as opposed to a pre-release) must be present on ISO > > media while the appropriately versioned generic-release > package > > must be available in the online release repository </run-on> > > Any opinions on the above phrasing? Discussed with Adam on #fedora-qa. I updated the wiki accordingly. https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_16_Final_Release_Criteria&action=historysubmit&diff=244437&oldid=244428 Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
