On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 13:07 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > On 06/23/2011 10:46 AM, James Laska wrote: > > Greetings testers, > > > > I've been playing with some ideas on how to allow secondary > > architectures to leverage the primary release criteria. I have some > > ideas/challenges that I'll send to the list for feedback later. > > However, in preparation for those ideas/concerns, I'd like to propose > > several changes to the release criteria. > > > > The proposed changes are intended to make the existing criteria slightly > > more generic, without losing their meaning. Additionally, I've made a > > few other minor changes and added a few questions. Please take a few > > minutes to review the proposed changes (highlighted in red at the links > > below). If nothing alarming surfaces during review, I'll proceed with > > operation genericize [1] early next week. > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jlaska/Draft_Alpha_criteria_revision > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jlaska/Draft_Beta_criteria_revision > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jlaska/Draft_Final_criteria_revision > > > > Thanks, > > James > > > > [1] Kudos to Adam for coining this gem! > > > > What should be done with nth bzs that were not resolved before 15 went > to press and have not been resolved with an update and are now present > in rawhide? Should they be moved up in priority and/or automatically > added to the 16 blocker bz? I hesitate to bulk add any unresolved NTH from a previous release. Mainly because it feels a bit like moving around deck chairs. Unless conditions/criteria/understand changed enough to warrant a second look at a bug, I'm fine with leaving them where they are. For your bug specifically, it sounds like there may still be interest in pursuing this. You can certainly add that to the appropriate F16 list, and also try to get this on the maintainer/upstream radar. > An example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681582 > > (BTW: 681582 probably should have been in the 15 release notes.) We can add that to Common_F15_Bugs if you like ... that's probably not a bad resolution for things folks feel will be "common" and remain unresolved. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
