On 06/03/2011 06:19 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I have a bug report (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710288) > that claims that manaworld 0.0.29 used $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, but that the > recent 0.5.2 didn't. Unless there is something subtle it looks like the > 0.5.2 is using $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. It obviously doesn't. C.f. the compiler calls inside of the build.logs, e.g.: cd /builddir/build/BUILD/tmw-0.5.2/src && /usr/bin/c++ -Wall -I/builddir/build/BUILD/tmw-0.5.2/src -I/usr/include/SDL -I/usr/include/libxml2 -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"0.5.2\" -DPKG_DATADIR=\"/usr/share/mana/\" -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale/\" -DENABLE_NLS=1 -DUSE_OPENGL -DUSE_X11 -o CMakeFiles/mana.dir/gui/widgets/avatarlistbox.cpp.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/tmw-0.5.2/src/gui/widgets/avatarlistbox.cpp If this package was honouring $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, the contents of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS would be found inside of this compiler call. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test