On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On the contrary, I like the idea. Given the example of 'terminal emulators', I for one
want to know if its going to be Konsole, or gnome-terminal, or xterm...
I have my favorite (ie. meets _my_ functional requirements), and I'd like to
know which one I'm going to get when I click on something in a menu.
Your comment on 'cryptic' executable names simply argues that
'executable names shouldn't be cryptic'... and I couldn't agree more.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Genes MailLists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Sorry but I have to disagree here, cryptic executable names don't
> On 06/02/2011 09:54 AM, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>
> (1) I think showing the executable name for every application is vital.
>
> Whether its directly in menu, popup or alternating pink flashing
> lights .. :-)
>
belong in the UI at all.
On the contrary, I like the idea. Given the example of 'terminal emulators', I for one
want to know if its going to be Konsole, or gnome-terminal, or xterm...
I have my favorite (ie. meets _my_ functional requirements), and I'd like to
know which one I'm going to get when I click on something in a menu.
Your comment on 'cryptic' executable names simply argues that
'executable names shouldn't be cryptic'... and I couldn't agree more.
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
