----- "drago01" gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Ralf Corsepius freenet.de> > wrote: > > On 05/31/2011 09:17 AM, drago01 wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Pasha R<pashar.ml@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Jason D. > Clintonjasonclinton.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 05:29, Pasha R<pashar.ml@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Probably, inability to configure your screensaver is much more > >>>>> noticeable than inability to stop copy operation. :) > >>>> > >>>> Now *that* is intentional. > >>> > >>> Care to explain the logic behind this? Because it is really beyond > my > >>> understanding. > >> > >> Screensavers has lost there use years ago. > >> With today's screens they don't really "save" anything but simply > >> waste power for no reason whatever. Be careful! A Plasma display needs the screensaver to prevent image burn. > > > > Correct, but there are much more energy wasting components. > > > > That said, I fail to understand how one can base a DE on GL. > > Using the GPU for drawing rather then the CPU is not wasting but > saving power. The GPU is (surprise surprise) way more efficient at > tasks like those. > Pretty much any smartphone or tablet UI (those are power constrained > devices) use a GL (or some other hardware accelerated) "desktop". > > So no using GL == wasting power is simply not true. (And if it really > is something is broken and needs to be fixed). > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
