On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 02:09 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: > On 05/18/2011 02:03 AM, Jon Stanley wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Adam Williamson<awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> I hope that's acceptable to all! If not, or anyone has ideas for > >> improvement, do say so... > > As a formerly very active QA guy, and less so now since I got a new > > $DAYJOB, I think that this makes sense, bit I do have minor concerns > > over what happens if someone goes and clears the blocker list just > > before the meeting for the sake of being able to say that there are > > none. I hope that this concern is mostly academic, though :) > > Well let's just hope for our own sake that we will notice if someone > suddenly goes and clears out the blocker list out of nowhere.. Yeah that's lame ... I think the likelihood of someone sabotaging the process is low, and we thankfully have plenty of smart folks involved monitoring the bugs should anything happen. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
