Hey, all. So, a concern was raised in passing at today's go/no-go meeting that we don't have a process to elect or otherwise select someone to represent QA at go/no-go meetings; usually myself or jlaska will cast QA's 'vote' at this meeting. I'm not sure it makes sense to set up a procedure just for this purpose, but what I thought would work is this: I've edited the go/no-go meeting wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting to specify the basis on which QA's 'vote' at this meeting is cast. It's really entirely deterministic; there's no discretion involved. If there are open unaddressed blockers, we do not approve the candidate for release. If there are no open unaddressed blockers, we do approve the candidate for release. There's really no wiggle room in this: any reason we have to not approve the release should be phrased as a release blocking bug in any case. With this in place, it really doesn't matter who casts QA's vote, or even if anyone does; QA's position can be inferred by anyone who knows how to work a web browser. I hope that's acceptable to all! If not, or anyone has ideas for improvement, do say so... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
