2011/5/17 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>: > On 05/18/2011 12:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> FESCo, and I believe spins sig also believes it should have a say. >> >> QA does indeed provide services to the entire distro, but our >> responsibility is to provide the best QA we can for the things the >> project considers a) vital and then b) important, not to_define_ what >> the project considers vital and important. We can provide advice - for >> instance, if FESCo were to propose that every desktop ever could block >> the release, we might advise that it was likely to be very difficult to >> provide reasonable testing coverage for that - but we don't ultimately >> have the right to take the decision. If FESCo ultimately chose to go >> ahead anyway it would be our responsibility to do the best job we could >> with QAing every desktop in Fedora, but when we inevitably failed, we >> could point out that we'd told 'em so. =) > > The project has long outgrown officially supporting and shipping a > single desktop ( which is good ) however various processes like the > design team and release engineering and us ( QA even thou I believe of > those we are the once that are best prepared for it ) are falling behind > the growth of the project which is bad. Could you drop this please. It is neither helpful or useful to the project. -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
