On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:13 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: > On 05/18/2011 12:07 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I would take it to FESCO. > > Fesco it is. > > I will post the relevant ticket once I've filed it to this threat for > other from QA community ( and any other interested party ) to cc > themselves upon choose they to do so. > > Thanks. FESCo, and I believe spins sig also believes it should have a say. QA does indeed provide services to the entire distro, but our responsibility is to provide the best QA we can for the things the project considers a) vital and then b) important, not to _define_ what the project considers vital and important. We can provide advice - for instance, if FESCo were to propose that every desktop ever could block the release, we might advise that it was likely to be very difficult to provide reasonable testing coverage for that - but we don't ultimately have the right to take the decision. If FESCo ultimately chose to go ahead anyway it would be our responsibility to do the best job we could with QAing every desktop in Fedora, but when we inevitably failed, we could point out that we'd told 'em so. =) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
