On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 9:58 AM David Sommerseth <dazo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I had an upstream SELinux pull-request merged in autumn 2020 [1]. But I > still don't see this SELinux boolean flag (renamed [2] to > "dbus_pass_tuntap_fd") present in Fedora 38. So I wonder how the > SELinux refpolicy is consumed into Fedora's SELinux policies ... when > can I expect to see this in Fedora and RHEL SELinux policies? > > [1] > <https://github.com/SELinuxProject/refpolicy/commit/79c7859a4807236693c734421642d5aacff0a9e2> > [2] > <https://github.com/SELinuxProject/refpolicy/commit/ba3818ebcc3a627bc331c61acf2df13d223452ea> > It's not consumed by Fedora or openSUSE at all. Fedora and openSUSE follow this instead: https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy As far as I know, there has been no reconciliation between the two happening anytime in the recent past and it's unlikely to happen anytime soon. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ selinux mailing list -- selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
