Re: Newbie asking about first policy file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 6:19 AM, Lukas Vrabec <lvrabec@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/02/2018 07:20 PM, leam hall wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Simon Sekidde <ssekidde@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Leam,
>>
>>> This rule should already exist in the current policy to suppress the alerts
>>>
>>>   dontaudit postfix_domain kernel_t : system module_request ;
>>
>>
>> Didn't see it. Stock and patched RHEL 6.
>>
>
> This could be kernel bug. We had a discussion about it:
> https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/commit/2c13be1fb543c51935785e7a43b798a9f35f5aa0#commitcomment-27837961
>
>
> But if you're running RHEL6, the bug shouldn't be there.
> If you're still see these AVCs please dontaudit it like it's mentioned
> in email from Simon.
>
> Lukas.

Not sure we want to hide the denial. Doesn't that mean SELinux is
preventing Postfix from doing something it thinks it should do?
Wouldn't allowing it be better, assuming Postfix is supposed to do
whatever?

Or do I not understand?

Leam
_______________________________________________
selinux mailing list -- selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux