Hi,
We know about this issue, I'm working on this.
Thank you for report.
On 10/15/2015 02:06 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Yes those should not be defined there.
On 10/15/2015 06:46 AM, William wrote:
Hi,
I was reading this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262812
And I noticed that even once updated (and making sure that selinux
-policy-devel doesn't provide docker.if) that I still get on a build:
make -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile
/usr/share/selinux/devel/include/contrib/apache.if:277: Error:
duplicate definition of apache_exec(). Original definition on 131.
/usr/share/selinux/devel/include/kernel/kernel.if:3879: Error:
duplicate definition of kernel_unlabeled_domtrans(). Original
definition on 485.
/usr/share/selinux/devel/include/kernel/kernel.if:3900: Error:
duplicate definition of kernel_unlabeled_entry_type(). Original
definition on 478.
/usr/share/selinux/devel/include/kernel/files.if:7840: Error: duplicate
definition of files_write_all_pid_sockets(). Original definition on
494.
/usr/share/selinux/devel/include/kernel/filesystem.if:4537: Error:
duplicate definition of fs_dontaudit_remount_tmpfs(). Original
definition on 464.
/usr/share/selinux/devel/include/kernel/devices.if:221: Error:
duplicate definition of dev_dontaudit_list_all_dev_nodes(). Original
definition on 471.
/usr/share/selinux/devel/include/kernel/devices.if:4499: Error:
duplicate definition of dev_dontaudit_mounton_sysfs(). Original
definition on 501.
It looks like selinux-docker is still defining a bunch of interfaces
that it shouldn't. Is this the correct behaviour?
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
--
Lukas Vrabec
SELinux Solutions
Red Hat, Inc.
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
