Yes those should not be defined there. On 10/15/2015 06:46 AM, William wrote: > Hi, > > I was reading this bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262812 > > And I noticed that even once updated (and making sure that selinux > -policy-devel doesn't provide docker.if) that I still get on a build: > > make -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile > /usr/share/selinux/devel/include/contrib/apache.if:277: Error: > duplicate definition of apache_exec(). Original definition on 131. > /usr/share/selinux/devel/include/kernel/kernel.if:3879: Error: > duplicate definition of kernel_unlabeled_domtrans(). Original > definition on 485. > /usr/share/selinux/devel/include/kernel/kernel.if:3900: Error: > duplicate definition of kernel_unlabeled_entry_type(). Original > definition on 478. > /usr/share/selinux/devel/include/kernel/files.if:7840: Error: duplicate > definition of files_write_all_pid_sockets(). Original definition on > 494. > /usr/share/selinux/devel/include/kernel/filesystem.if:4537: Error: > duplicate definition of fs_dontaudit_remount_tmpfs(). Original > definition on 464. > /usr/share/selinux/devel/include/kernel/devices.if:221: Error: > duplicate definition of dev_dontaudit_list_all_dev_nodes(). Original > definition on 471. > /usr/share/selinux/devel/include/kernel/devices.if:4499: Error: > duplicate definition of dev_dontaudit_mounton_sysfs(). Original > definition on 501. > > It looks like selinux-docker is still defining a bunch of interfaces > that it shouldn't. Is this the correct behaviour? > > -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
