> From: Daniel J Walsh [mailto:dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 06 June 2012 13:54 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/06/2012 07:05 AM, Moray Henderson wrote: > >> From: Daniel J Walsh [mailto:dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 04 June 2012 > >> 15:23 > >> > >> On 06/04/2012 02:55 AM, Miroslav Grepl wrote: > >>> On 05/31/2012 11:46 AM, Moray Henderson wrote: > >>>> I'm updating a custom policy from CentOS 5 to CentOS 6. The > module > >>>> builds successfully, but fails to load: > >>>> > >>>> # semodule -i mypolicy.pp > >>>> /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts: Invalid > >>>> argument > >>>> libsemanage.semanage_install_active: setfiles returned error code > 1. > >>>> semodule: Failed! > >>>> > >>>> It took me some time to work out that the error should have read: > >>>> > >>>> File context already exists for /var/run/passenger: mypolicy.fc > >>>> line > >>>> 5 > >>>> > >>>> Now that I know there is already policy for Passenger, I can > adjust > >>>> mine accordingly. Any chance of getting a more helpful version of > >>>> the error included in semodule? > >>> There is a bug > >>> > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822320 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Moray. "To err is human; to purr, feline." > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux > >>> > >>> -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux > >>> > >>> > >> Not sure this is the right bugzilla. > >> > >> In Fedora 17 I get > >> > >> semodule -i mypol.pp > /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts: > >> Multiple different specifications for /var/run/passenger(/.*)? > >> (system_u:object_r:passenger_var_run_t:s0 and > >> system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0). > >> /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts: Invalid argument > >> libsemanage.semanage_install_active: setfiles returned error code 1. > >> semodule: Failed! > > > > Thanks Daniel, that looks like the one. Would be nice if it could > > display which line of the .fc file caused the problem, but if not > > there is enough information now to track it down. I couldn't find > > "file_contexts multiple different specifications" in Red Hat's > > bugzilla, though. There were a few for "file_contexts invalid > argument", but none of them describe this issue. > > Do you know if that fix from Fedora 17 will get through to RHEL 6? > > > > > > Moray. “To err is human; to purr, feline.” > > > > > > -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux > > The fix is in libsemanage, actually. Open a bugzilla on libsemanage > for this and we will see if libsemanage gets on the approved package > list. Logged https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829378. Thanks. Moray. “To err is human; to purr, feline.” -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
