-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/24/2012 12:24 PM, David Quigley wrote: > On 05/24/2012 12:14, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On 05/24/2012 11:05 AM, Moray > Henderson wrote: >>>> I've got a policy module which works fine when I build and load it >>>> on CentOS 5. When I build and try to load it on CentOS 6 it >>>> complains: >>>> >>>> SELinux: Could not downgrade policy file >>>> /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.24, searching for an older >>>> version. SELinux: Could not open policy file <= >>>> /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.24: No such file or directory >>>> >>>> There's nothing in the policy source specifying version so I would >>>> have expected the module automatically to build for the correct >>>> policy version when built on CentOS 6. Any pointers where to look or >>>> what to do next? >>>> >>>> >>>> Moray. "To err is human; to purr, feline." >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux > > > Read > > http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/49762.html >> -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux > > I don't think your post applies to his question. His email seems to > indicate to me that he is building the policy binary on RHEL 6 for RHEL 6 > and then on install time its trying to downgrade the policy. He is > wondering why it didn't just build for the policy version being used by the > system. > > Dave -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux What policy file did it build? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk++hXMACgkQrlYvE4MpobMToACgo2k5nt6bCjr1/7tv1Zr1AeuG 6XYAn1RfCfxEsIvu0RqvIYswxg6HII6q =g2JS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
