Re: Policy version mismatch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/24/2012 12:14, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/24/2012 11:05 AM, Moray Henderson wrote:
I've got a policy module which works fine when I build and load it on
CentOS 5.  When I build and try to load it on CentOS 6 it complains:

SELinux:  Could not downgrade policy file
/etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.24, searching for an older version.
SELinux:  Could not open policy file <=
/etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.24:  No such file or directory

There's nothing in the policy source specifying version so I would have expected the module automatically to build for the correct policy version when built on CentOS 6. Any pointers where to look or what to do next?


Moray. "To err is human; to purr, feline."





-- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux


Read

http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/49762.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk++XlAACgkQrlYvE4MpobMf+wCghm6D/Gn5Yh9mLIHF1vTo5k2m
7KkAnRSdi7LWcywz1LeE6ir8nygh1wVj
=hxTJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux

I don't think your post applies to his question. His email seems to indicate to me that he is building the policy binary on RHEL 6 for RHEL 6 and then on install time its trying to downgrade the policy. He is wondering why it didn't just build for the policy version being used by the system.

Dave
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux