On 05/24/2012 12:14, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/2012 11:05 AM, Moray Henderson wrote:
I've got a policy module which works fine when I build and load it
on
CentOS 5. When I build and try to load it on CentOS 6 it complains:
SELinux: Could not downgrade policy file
/etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.24, searching for an older
version.
SELinux: Could not open policy file <=
/etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.24: No such file or directory
There's nothing in the policy source specifying version so I would
have
expected the module automatically to build for the correct policy
version
when built on CentOS 6. Any pointers where to look or what to do
next?
Moray. "To err is human; to purr, feline."
-- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
Read
http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/49762.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk++XlAACgkQrlYvE4MpobMf+wCghm6D/Gn5Yh9mLIHF1vTo5k2m
7KkAnRSdi7LWcywz1LeE6ir8nygh1wVj
=hxTJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
I don't think your post applies to his question. His email seems to
indicate to me that he is building the policy binary on RHEL 6 for RHEL
6 and then on install time its trying to downgrade the policy. He is
wondering why it didn't just build for the policy version being used by
the system.
Dave
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux