-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2011 09:41 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > Currently, the SELinux policy for dkim in Fedora (at least for F-15 > and Rawhide) is in the milter module, whereas upstream has a > separate dkim module. I'm looking at adding support for opendkim (a > fork of dkim-milter), which has recently been imported to Fedora, > and if I send a patch upstream, it's not going to get pulled into > Fedora because Fedora is using a patched milter module rather than > upstream's dkim module. Is there any reason for this other than it > being a historical thing due to it being in Fedora before > upstream? > > Paul. -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux Lets work to get the Upstream and Fedora code merged. I have a feeling others have worked on the Fedora policy that are using the milters all the time, so I think our stuff is good. dgrift and mgrepl would no better then I. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5uBa0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobPe6QCgifoGmjZVnBwtllkH7idxmfhB 3tYAoMf2f16E7q2Q9hVMA+TdychfS8mF =CKkz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
