Currently, the SELinux policy for dkim in Fedora (at least for F-15 and Rawhide) is in the milter module, whereas upstream has a separate dkim module. I'm looking at adding support for opendkim (a fork of dkim-milter), which has recently been imported to Fedora, and if I send a patch upstream, it's not going to get pulled into Fedora because Fedora is using a patched milter module rather than upstream's dkim module. Is there any reason for this other than it being a historical thing due to it being in Fedora before upstream? Paul. -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
