( Sent this yesterday from the wrong account, didn't make the list ) Nailed it in one. I guess I had presumed that /etc/sysconfig/selinux was authoritative. -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 457 May 11 08:32 selinux lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 May 10 08:12 selinux.gres -> ../selinux/config Looks like I ran sed on the wrong file. Eric On 5/11/11 5:37 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On 05/11/2011 04:41 PM, Dominick Grift wrote: >> On 05/11/2011 04:31 PM, Eric Warnke wrote: >> >>> The problems with corosync are a direct result of the system not >>> respecting the /etc/sysconfog/selinux directives. >> >> Is /etc/sysconfig/selinux also a symbolic links to /etc/selinux/config >> on your system? >> >> This is what i see on rawhide: >> >> lrwxrwxrwx. root root system_u:object_r:etc_t:s0 selinux -> >> ../selinux/config >> >> rpm -qf /etc/sysconfig/selinux >> selinux-policy-3.9.16-15.fc16.noarch >> >> My fedora 14 configuration seems to not even have a >> /etc/sysconfig/selinux softlink. Although rpm -qf /etc/sysconfig/selinux >> does return the selinux-policy package. >> >> What happens if you modify /etc/selinux/config directly? >> >> >- -- >selinux mailing list >selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux > >Yes I would suspect you broke the link. /etc/selinux/config is the >correct location to modify with /etc/sysconfig/selinux a symbolic link >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) >Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > >iEYEARECAAYFAk3LAZcACgkQrlYvE4MpobMlggCg5uZMoZ8ZD56YOl9+TAp8jTvF >yNgAni/6FMRqAXcF1bm64/xIlkSIMLrN >=pN7+ >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >-- >selinux mailing list >selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
